<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>welp&#039;s blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://01welp.co.uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://01welp.co.uk</link>
	<description>random ramblings from welp</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:42:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Issues with C++ strings in OS X&#8217;s standard library</title>
		<link>http://01welp.co.uk/2010/02/issues-with-c-strings-in-os-xs-standard-library/</link>
		<comments>http://01welp.co.uk/2010/02/issues-with-c-strings-in-os-xs-standard-library/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>welp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c++]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[string]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unviersity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xcode]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://01welp.co.uk/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that someone at Apple has turned on _GLIBCXX_FULLY_DYNAMIC_STRING in such a way that it is breaking _GLIBCXX_DEBUG builds. This means that (with some Xcode/GCC/OS X versions) if you try to use strings from the C++ standard library without enabling the _GLIBXX_FULLY_DYNAMIC_STRING preprocessor macro, your debug builds will have a runtime error similar to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that someone at Apple has turned on <code>_GLIBCXX_FULLY_DYNAMIC_STRING</code> in such a way that it is breaking <code>_GLIBCXX_DEBUG</code> builds. This means that (with some Xcode/GCC/OS X versions) if you try to use strings from the C++ standard library without enabling the <code>_GLIBXX_FULLY_DYNAMIC_STRING</code> preprocessor macro, your debug builds will have a runtime error similar to the following:</p>
<pre>malloc: * error for object 0x10000a720: pointer being freed was not allocated *
    set a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug</pre>
<p>In order to solve this issue from Xcode, you need to modify your build target information. Double-click your build target from the &#8216;Targets&#8217; drop-down list in the left-hand column, navigate to the build tab, then scroll down to the &#8216;GCC &#8211; Preprocessing&#8217; area, and enable fully dynamic strings by adding a new macro to the &#8216;Preprocessor Macros&#8217; list: <code>_GLIBCXX_FULLY_DYNAMIC_STRING=1</code></p>
<p>Feel free to leave a comment if you have any extra information on the issue (including fixes in newer versions/etc/etc).</p>
<p>References:<br />
<a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2234557/c-using-stdgetline-prints-pointer-being-freed-was-not-allocated"> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2234557/c-using-stdgetline-prints-pointer-being-freed-was-not-allocated</a><br />
<a href="http://lists.apple.com/archives/cocoa-dev/2009/Sep/msg01199.html"> http://lists.apple.com/archives/cocoa-dev/2009/Sep/msg01199.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://01welp.co.uk/2010/02/issues-with-c-strings-in-os-xs-standard-library/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On learning (and being lazy)</title>
		<link>http://01welp.co.uk/2010/02/on-learning-and-being-lazy/</link>
		<comments>http://01welp.co.uk/2010/02/on-learning-and-being-lazy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>welp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[note-taking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[productivity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://01welp.co.uk/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just before exams started, I experimented with a new note-taking method as part of my revision process. I&#8217;ve since decided to use this method for all of my notes for the foreseeable future.
Being deaf, I&#8217;m eligible for a DSA (Disabled Students Allowance) grant, which would provide for services such as note-taking and video transcriptions. However&#8230; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just before exams started, I experimented with a new note-taking method as part of my revision process. I&#8217;ve since decided to use this method for <strong>all</strong> of my notes for the foreseeable future.</p>
<p>Being deaf, I&#8217;m eligible for a DSA (Disabled Students Allowance) grant, which would provide for services such as note-taking and video transcriptions. However&#8230; me being the good coder I am, I&#8217;m also inherently lazy (this post may well have a few contradictions, I&#8217;ll warn you in advance!), I haven&#8217;t yet applied for DSA, so I don&#8217;t get any notetakers or anything. This, however, was also partly a justified choice on my part &#8211; while I&#8217;ve had note-takers in the past, I found that I generally did better in subjects in which I did not have a note-taker, and this got me thinking &#8211; was the note-taker holding me back?</p>
<p>The answer, I believe, was a resounding &#8220;yes&#8221;. While I would attempt to pay attention in lessons/lectures, I undoubtedly had the &#8220;well, I can always refer to the notes I&#8217;ll be given&#8221; mentality, which resulted in a smaller attention span. <strong>I never did refer to those notes</strong>.</p>
<p>If I don&#8217;t have a note-taker, I know that in order to do well, I <strong>will</strong> have to pay attention to the lecturer. Unfortunately, due to my disability, I am unable to take notes and listen simultaneously.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve started using PBWorks for my notes. I&#8217;ll pay attention in the lecture, leave the lecture, and while the knowledge is still fresh in my head, I open up my PBWorks wiki and start writing up all of the notes from the lecture, using the slides as a visual reminder for what was covered. If there is something I don&#8217;t fully understand, I will research the topic in detail &#8211; resulting in higher-quality notes. As an example, a set of (incomplete) notes from last semester&#8217;s CS221 module can be seen <a href="http://welp.pbworks.com/CS221">here</a>. The notes are much more in-depth than the slides &#8211; as well as many, many times easier to read.</p>
<p>While this may not (at first glance) seem to adhere with my &#8220;be lazy&#8221; principles, adding to a single set of notes for each module will inherently require me to refer back to previous notes in order to refresh my knowledge about a particular topic before I am able to complete a full set of notes for a given lecture. This allows one to subconsciously review course material throughout the entire duration of the course, the knock-on effect of which is a reduced requirement for revision before the exam.</p>
<pre>this.lazy++;</pre>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://01welp.co.uk/2010/02/on-learning-and-being-lazy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The awesomeness which is FOSDEM</title>
		<link>http://01welp.co.uk/2010/02/the-awesomeness-which-is-fosdem/</link>
		<comments>http://01welp.co.uk/2010/02/the-awesomeness-which-is-fosdem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>welp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aberystwyth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brussels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheesecake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FOSDEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minibus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://01welp.co.uk/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This year, I managed to attend FOSDEM without any mishaps (such as broken legs&#8230;) for my third time! For those of you who don&#8217;t know, FOSDEM stands for Free and Open-source Software Developers&#8217; European Meeting &#8211; held every February at the ULB in Brussels. This year&#8217;s event had around 300 talks and over 5000 attendees [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This year, I managed to attend <a href="http://www.fosdem.org/">FOSDEM</a> without any mishaps (such as broken legs&#8230;) for my third time! For those of you who don&#8217;t know, FOSDEM stands for Free and Open-source Software Developers&#8217; European Meeting &#8211; held every February at the <a href="http://www.ulb.ac.be/">ULB</a> in Brussels. This year&#8217;s event had around 300 talks and over 5000 attendees &#8211; over 1000 of whom attended the <a href="http://www.fosdem.org/2010/beerevent">Beer Event</a> at <a href="http://www.deliriumcafe.be/">Delirium</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://pcbo.dcs.aber.ac.uk/blog/">Richard Shipman</a> &#8211; one of the Open Source zealots at <a href="http://www.aber.ac.uk/">Aberystwyth University</a> &#8211; hired a minibus in order to take 16 students along to FOSDEM. We left Aberystwyth at noon on Thursday, hopped on the ferry at Harwich and arrived at the Hoek van Holland early Friday morning. We were at ULB by about noon on Friday, eager and willing to help out &#8211; Richard had volunteered all of the students for a good 3-4 hours of slave labour at the hands of the FOSDEM organisers. I was a part of the networking team and helped lay many, many, many meters of cable around the university for the event. This year&#8217;s FOSDEM had the best network it had ever seen, with over 2500 users connected.</p>
<p>After checking in at the hotel, we wandered around Brussels a bit, ate some rather delicious Belgian waffles from a stand, and headed over to the Beer Event. I drank <strong>way </strong>too much, but I managed to do quite a bit of networking, and left with the contact details for a few new friends and also met up with a large number of old friends &#8211; all in all, a good night!</p>
<p>Woke up with a splitting headache (rather unsurprisingly), but still managed to attend all of the talks I wanted to on the Saturday &#8211; all of which were extremely interesting. We went to the <a href="http://www.cheesecakecafe.be/">Cheese Cake Cafe</a> on Saturday evening, before settling in for an early night. We had to check out of the hotel on Sunday morning, and Richard had to be at ULB by 0930 at the latest. The FOSDEM staff very kindly reserved two parking spaces for the &#8220;Unspeakable University&#8221;, which was rather kind of them! I  managed to get some of the talk times mixed up, which resulted in me missing a couple of talks, but I was still able to attend a huge number of very interesting talks and met even more people!</p>
<p>After the final talk finished on Sunday at 1800, we all hopped in the mini-bus and drove to Hoek van Holland, where we got on the ferry back to Harwich, eventually arriving back in Aberystwyth at about 1430 on Monday, in a <strong>very</strong> sleepy state!</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t wait for next year! Although I will probably travel on the Eurostar rather than on a minibus&#8230; it was just a tad too cramped for my liking!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://01welp.co.uk/2010/02/the-awesomeness-which-is-fosdem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I got a Mac!</title>
		<link>http://01welp.co.uk/2010/01/i-got-a-mac/</link>
		<comments>http://01welp.co.uk/2010/01/i-got-a-mac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>welp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://01welp.co.uk/?p=68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I, uuh&#8230; successfully broke my ThinkPad T61 the other day. Still not quite sure how I managed that! But the hinge just completely snapped, and I broke the LCD further whilst attempting to take the LCD bezel off.
So I was computerless! Well, not quite computerless, but working on the ThinkPad became a bit iffy. Two [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, uuh&#8230; successfully broke my ThinkPad T61 the other day. Still not quite sure how I managed that! But the hinge just completely snapped, and I broke the LCD further whilst attempting to take the LCD bezel off.</p>
<p>So I was computerless! Well, not quite computerless, but working on the ThinkPad became a bit iffy. Two &#8220;fixes&#8221; were investigated: purchasing a temporary laptop whilst getting the T61 fixed; buying a new laptop to replace the T61 completely.</p>
<p>The first option &#8211; to buy a new laptop to use whilst getting the T61 repaired was thrown out of the window quite quickly. To the get the entire LCD assembly replaced on my T61 would have been prohibitively expensive, excaberated by two factors. a) I&#8217;d have to purchase a temporary laptop as well; b) I originally purchased the T61 with a high-resolution (1400&#215;1050) LCD, which I had grown rather fond of. In addition to those two factors, I had also been planning on <a href="http://01welp.co.uk/2009/06/explaining-my-planned-move-to-a-mac/">upgrading to a Mac</a> in the relatively near future.</p>
<p>So we decided to go for the upgrade route! I put in order for a 13&#8243; MacBook Pro, which arrived yesterday morning. After fiddling around with things for most of the day (or possibly more accurately: working out what various buttons did), I finally had it set up how I liked it. I can definitely say that the move to Apple/OS X was a good one, and I&#8217;m thoroughly enjoying it.</p>
<p>As can be expected from moving to a different operating system (and possibly even a different way of thinking), my &#8220;working environment&#8221; has had to be adjusted. I didn&#8217;t really like OS X&#8217;s Spaces (even though I was a huge fan of multiple desktops in Linux), and this has led me to only keeping open the applications which I&#8217;m actively using open. In the past, I&#8217;d have web/email on one desktop, IM on another desktop and code on my third desktop. However, I&#8217;d keep switching to IM/web/email whilst coding &#8211; not very productive! Using OS X has encouraged me to only open what I need to complete a particular task &#8211; so if I&#8217;m programming, I&#8217;ll have Eclipse or TextMate open, and only open Safari if I need to quickly look something up. That&#8217;s it. It has resulted in huge productivity gains &#8211; I&#8217;m not quite sure why I didn&#8217;t work this out before!</p>
<p>On another note, I&#8217;ve become a huge fan of <a href="http://macromates.com/">TextMate</a> and <a href="http://www.atebits.com/tweetie-mac/">Tweetie</a>. Now, when I was using Linux, I would never have even considered forking out some of my *ahem* hard-earned money for a program. Ever. If I was using Microsoft Windows I would either use an Open Source application which had been ported to Windows, or (I&#8217;m sorry to say) I would pirate it. Now I&#8217;m perfectly willing to pay for software, and plan to do so for TextMate and Tweetie as soon as I can. They are both amazing pieces of software, and I&#8217;d strongly recommend them to any OS X users. I&#8217;m also using <a href="http://www.red-sweater.com/marsedit/">MarsEdit</a> to write this blog post, but I currently blog so infrequently that I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;d be willing to purchase it. Perhaps if it encourages me to blog more, I&#8217;ll look into paying for a full version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://01welp.co.uk/2010/01/i-got-a-mac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>eBooks vs. Real Books</title>
		<link>http://01welp.co.uk/2009/08/ebooks-vs-real-books/</link>
		<comments>http://01welp.co.uk/2009/08/ebooks-vs-real-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>welp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://01welp.co.uk/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I mentioned in my last blog post, I do enjoy my reading, even though it does come at a cost (which I do tend to complain about&#8230;). A number of my friends have suggested getting an eBook reader and getting my books in a digital format, which is quite often cheaper. There are a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I mentioned in my last blog post, I do enjoy my reading, even though it does come at a cost (which I do tend to complain about&#8230;). A number of my friends have suggested getting an eBook reader and getting my books in a digital format, which is quite often cheaper. There are a number of benefits to eBooks:</p>
<ul>
<li>Portability &#8211; Ever wanted to take your entire book collection on holiday with you? eBooks make it possible! (Okay, perhaps not quite depending on memory restrictions, but eBooks are <strong>definitely</strong> more portable than their paper counterparts).</li>
<li>Searching &#8211; Obviously, with academic texts this can be a great boon, but I find it very rare that I attempt to search for a particular word or phrase in a novel of some form.</li>
<li>Backlighting &#8211; To the best of my knowledge, modern e-Ink eBook readers do not have backlighting available, and so are only readable in the same conditions as regular paper. I could be wrong here, so please feel free to correct me!</li>
<li>Price &#8211; If you&#8217;re going to quote monetary savings as a reason to get an eBook reader, I&#8217;m probably going to ignore you. eBooks are generally only £1-2 cheaper than their paper counterparts (in the UK, at least), and Amazon often offer bigger discounts on their real books.</li>
<li>DRM &#8211; If you&#8217;re a publisher, this might be a good thing. But I think a lot of people would quite like to be able to lend books to their friends and family without having to worry about DRM restrictions and so on&#8230; Paper books are <strong>so</strong> easy to lend, you just hand the book on to someone else. How do you lend someone an eBook?</li>
</ul>
<p>I can see why eBook readers would definitely be an ideal solution for reading and distributing academic texts, but I really can&#8217;t see the benefits (at this moment in time) over &#8220;real&#8221; books. I also quite like to be able to flick through books, jump back and forth, quickly refer to something on the previous page (without having to wait for the lengthy &#8220;refresh&#8221; on e-Ink eBook readers) and various other things like that&#8230;</p>
<p>Oh! One more thing! I <strong>love</strong> good cover art. I know I&#8217;m not supposed to, but I often do judge a book by its cover&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://01welp.co.uk/2009/08/ebooks-vs-real-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is it that&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://01welp.co.uk/2009/08/why-is-it-that/</link>
		<comments>http://01welp.co.uk/2009/08/why-is-it-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 20:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>welp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expensive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infinite Summer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sailing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skiing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://01welp.co.uk/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230; I always seem to pick the expensive hobbies? Seriously. Sailing, skiing and shooting are the three primary sports in which I participate. None of these sports come cheap &#8211; both in terms of costs associated with purchasing boats/skis/guns, but in actually doing the sport &#8211; you need to pay for mooring and fuel costs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; I always seem to pick the expensive hobbies? Seriously. Sailing, skiing and shooting are the three primary sports in which I participate. None of these sports come cheap &#8211; both in terms of costs associated with purchasing boats/skis/guns, but in actually <strong>doing</strong> the sport &#8211; you need to pay for mooring and fuel costs for boats, you have to pay for flights and accommodation when you go skiing and you have to pay for cartridges and other costs when shooting.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve recently taken up photography as a new hobby &#8211; if one shoots with a digital camera, the cost of a new camera is more often than not over £500 for a half-decent one. Let&#8217;s not even think about the lenses, which can easily sell for multiple hundreds of pounds for relatively &#8220;basic&#8221; models, and over £1000 for the &#8220;pro&#8221; models. If one shoots film, one has to pay for film and development costs. These all add up in a big way (not to mention the cost of the high-end film cameras &#8211; especially MF (Medium-Format) cameras).</p>
<p>One &#8220;hobby&#8221; I&#8217;ve been involved in since a really young age is reading. Okay, so at first glance reading isn&#8217;t that expensive. But when you&#8217;re finishing a £6-8 novel every other day or so (as I tend to do during the holiday season when I attempt to take a break from computers), it gets <strong>really fucking expensive</strong>. Since coming back from Aberystwyth on the 19th July (less than two weeks ago), I&#8217;ve read <strong>£73.91</strong> worth of books. That&#8217;s almost <strong>three quarters of a hundred pounds</strong>. My wallet is crying (as is my bank account). It doesn&#8217;t help that I have another <strong>£49.95</strong> worth of books on order&#8230; And that&#8217;s for five books alone.</p>
<p>I think my main issue is the fact that I like to buy my own physical books. And I like them to be new. This leads to two major problems:</p>
<ol>
<li>I can&#8217;t buy books second-hand (well, I can. I just don&#8217;t want to and would probably refuse to do so)</li>
<li>I can&#8217;t borrow books from the library (see above)</li>
<li>I can&#8217;t read eBooks (they &#8220;feel&#8221; wrong)</li>
</ol>
<p>Buggeration. Anyone want to recommend some cheaper hobbies for me? Pretty please?</p>
<p>On a side note, I&#8217;m starting the <a href="http://infinitesummer.org/">Infinite Summer</a> project when my copy of the book arrives tomorrow (albeit about a month and a bit behind <a href="http://infinitesummer.org/archives/168">schedule</a>), <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0349121087/ref=ox_ya_oh_product">Infinite Jest</a> is apparently about 1000 pages long and relatively difficult to read. Hopefully this means I&#8217;ll put buying new books on the backburner for a wee while &#8211; especially as I&#8217;ll have another 3 books to finish after it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://01welp.co.uk/2009/08/why-is-it-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Explaining my planned move to a Mac.</title>
		<link>http://01welp.co.uk/2009/06/explaining-my-planned-move-to-a-mac/</link>
		<comments>http://01welp.co.uk/2009/06/explaining-my-planned-move-to-a-mac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>welp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://01welp.co.uk/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As most of you probably know, about 2 months ago, I retired from Gentoo. I have been using Fedora as my &#8220;distribution of choice&#8221; on my laptop since that time, and I have been very impressed with it on the whole.
However, there have been a number of niggles which have been putting me off using [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As most of you probably know, about 2 months ago, I <a href="http://01welp.co.uk/2009/05/retiring-unless-otherwise-requested/">retired from Gentoo</a>. I have been using Fedora as my &#8220;distribution of choice&#8221; on my laptop since that time, and I have been very impressed with it on the whole.</p>
<p>However, there have been a number of niggles which have been putting me off using Linux for a laptop. It&#8217;s highly likely that less &#8220;advanced&#8221; users wouldn&#8217;t experience the same issues I&#8217;ve been having, but none the less. I&#8217;ll outline the issues I&#8217;ve been having, then expand upon each of them in turn.</p>
<ul>
<li>Photo management software (<a href="http://f-spot.org/Main_Page">F-Spot</a>) is not particularly feature-rich, is slow and relatively buggy</li>
<li>Need to fiddle around with things to get, for example, VPN connections working</li>
<li>Hibernate/suspend doesn&#8217;t work</li>
<li>Not much in the way of &#8220;set and forget&#8221; backup solutions</li>
</ul>
<p>Although F-Spot does what it needs to do (mostly), it is extremely basic, and doesn&#8217;t offer solutions such as colour curve adjustment, converting images to black and white, scaling images, cropping images, and so on (unless I&#8217;ve missed something). It also doesn&#8217;t allow you to organise your photos quite as well as other photo management software, such as <a href="http://www.apple.com/aperture/">Aperture</a> and <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshoplightroom/">Lightroom</a>. I discovered a bug in my installation, which left both the F-Spot developers and me scratching our heads: attempting to export photos to Flickr crashes F-Spot if I launch it from Gnome&#8217;s menu. If I launch it from the terminal, I have no such issues&#8230; The options haven&#8217;t changed, and I can&#8217;t work out any way to pipe the error messages from when I launch it from Gnome&#8217;s menu to a file&#8230;</p>
<p>I use the VPN functionality quite a bit these days to connect to the University&#8217;s VPN whilst not on the University network. Although I have managed to get the VPN working thanks to one of my friends, I had to fiddle around with adding and modifying keys in the GConf editor, which I really should not have had to do. It might be possible to do it all through NetworkManager&#8217;s interface (I know that some of the options were available in the &#8220;Advanced Settings&#8221; dialog), but it was still a nuisance to sort it all out (and it was also undocumented. DO NOT WANT.)</p>
<p>Hibernate and suspend do not work on my ThinkPad T61. I&#8217;d suspect that this has something to do with using discreet nVidia graphics, but I would still like such features to work out of the box. I&#8217;ve had this laptop since Feb &#8216;08, and I&#8217;ve *still* not managed to get it working. With the MacBook Pros, you can just close it and wander off: everything just works.</p>
<p>Linux doesn&#8217;t really have a &#8220;set and forget&#8221; backup system such as <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/what-is-macosx/time-machine.html">Time Machine</a>. With Time Machine, you set it up to backup to $external_harddisk, and it does it all for you. You just plug your MacBook in, and it automatically starts backing up in the background. You don&#8217;t have to think about it at all until you need it, at which point, you just fly back in time through their shiny interface, and you&#8217;re sorted. It really is quite nice.</p>
<p>I guess that I&#8217;m just &#8220;shifting&#8221; my expectations somewhat now that I&#8217;ve been at university for a year. At the beginning of the year, I was happy to fiddle around with things to get them to work. I was happy to make tarballs and <code>scp</code> or <code>rsync</code> them to remote locations to back things up. I was using Gentoo, and happy to sit through long compiles and reinstalls. Now, though, I just want things to work. I don&#8217;t want to have to fiddle around with obscure settings to make it work. I don&#8217;t want to have to sit through long compiles. I guess I want to be able to <strong>use</strong> my computer for what I want to use it for, without being side-tracked along half a dozen different mini-projects to be able to complete my main goal.</p>
<p>On top of that, Macs are shiny. I think that the <a href="http://www.apple.com/displays/">Apple LED Cinema Display which has been designed specifically to go with the MacBook Pro</a> is amazing, and just perfect for what I want. It allows me to compromise on the display resolution on the MacBook Pro itself (the MacBook Pro has a 13&#8243; screen which operates at 1280&#215;800. I&#8217;m a huge fan of portability, so I want to get the smallest model I can.), as I can just plug it in to instantly upgrade my resolution.</p>
<p>I think I shall probably write a number of blog posts about the software which I currently use and compare it to what I plan to use. Doing so should help me confirm the &#8220;upgrade route&#8221; I&#8217;m going to take, and how I&#8217;m going to manage my files and hobbies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://01welp.co.uk/2009/06/explaining-my-planned-move-to-a-mac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympus E-P1 and my next computer.</title>
		<link>http://01welp.co.uk/2009/06/olympus-e-p1-and-my-next-computer/</link>
		<comments>http://01welp.co.uk/2009/06/olympus-e-p1-and-my-next-computer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>welp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-P1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://01welp.co.uk/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Olympus E-P1 looks absolutely stunning. It&#8217;s highly likely that I&#8217;ll be buying one of those come September.
The E-P1 does away with the mirror box of D-SLRs, whilst retaining a large Micro Four Thirds sized sensor, which results in a camera which isn&#8217;t really an SLR, but produces high quality images akin to those typical [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Olympus E-P1 looks absolutely stunning. It&#8217;s highly likely that I&#8217;ll be buying one of those come September.</p>
<p>The E-P1 does away with the mirror box of D-SLRs, whilst retaining a large Micro Four Thirds sized sensor, which results in a camera which isn&#8217;t really an SLR, but produces high quality images akin to those typical of D-SLRs. It seems to be an ideal camera for street photography &#8211; the silver model isn&#8217;t overly obtrusive, and coupled with the 17mm lens and optical viewfinder (fitted onto the hot-shoe), makes for a compact camera capable of taking high-quality images whilst still being small enough to not be highly noticeable. It is quite expensive, at £749.99 for the kit including the 17mm lens and optical viewfinder, but I feel that it is well worth it, and there won&#8217;t be many (if any) running costs involved &#8211; no film to develop and scan. As well as this, Olympus will be producing an adaptor which will allow me to use my OM lenses from my OM-2n on the E-P1, which is a great benefit. I will be waiting until reviews are available on the camera before making a final decision, but I&#8217;m almost certain that it is the camera for me.</p>
<p>I have also been looking into the 13&#8243; MacBook Pro, and believe that come September, I will have enough money to purchase a model. I&#8217;m willing to accept the lower resolution of the 13&#8243; model due to the extra portability offered, especially as I am also planning to purchase the 24&#8243; Apple Cinema Display to go with it, which runs at 1920&#215;1200. An expensive investment, but well worth it I feel. The MacBook Pro comes with an SDHC card-reader, which will be extremely useful when coupled with the aforementioned Olympus E-P1, which also uses SDHC cards &#8211; that&#8217;s one less cable for me to worry about! It is highly likely that I will purchase Aperture with the MacBook, and use that for photo management. I&#8217;ve looked into Lightroom as well, but it seems from reviews that Aperture is more suited to my needs. Furthermore, Macs provide an ideal environment for doing development work in, especially as they are Unix-based, and thus have a half-decent shell available to users. I&#8217;ll most likely be using Eclipse for Java programming, and I&#8217;ll possibly be doing some Qt development on Macs as well, but we shall see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://01welp.co.uk/2009/06/olympus-e-p1-and-my-next-computer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mozilla Firefox 3.5 Beta 4 and colour profiles</title>
		<link>http://01welp.co.uk/2009/06/mozilla-firefox-35-beta-4-and-colour-profiles/</link>
		<comments>http://01welp.co.uk/2009/06/mozilla-firefox-35-beta-4-and-colour-profiles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 09:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>welp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colour profiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla Firefox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://01welp.co.uk/?p=43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After upgrading to Fedora 11 (and thus upgrading Firefox to 3.5 Beta 4), I noticed that Firefox was not correctly identifying some of the ICC colour profiles and thus was rendering some of the images incorrectly.
According to this wiki page, it should be a simple matter of going to about:config and changing the value of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After upgrading to Fedora 11 (and thus upgrading Firefox to 3.5 Beta 4), I noticed that Firefox was not correctly identifying some of the ICC colour profiles and thus was rendering some of the images incorrectly.</p>
<p>According to <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/En/ICC_color_correction_in_Firefox">this wiki page</a>, it should be a simple matter of going to about:config and changing the value of <code>gfx.color_management.mode</code> to <code>1</code>, which enables full colour management (default is <code>2</code>, which enables colour management only on properly tagged images). This, however, does not seem to work&#8230;</p>
<p>After looking into the issue, it seems that there&#8217;s a bug with the way in which Firefox identifies the colour profiles, resulting in some incorrectly rendered images. Although the bug has been fixed in the trunk release (i.e. the nightly/hourly builds will have the bug-fix), the &#8220;proper&#8221; versioned releases will not.</p>
<p><a href="http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=23&amp;t=1219685">From what I can work out</a>, the bug-fix won&#8217;t be pushed into the main release until the last minute, and will most likely be put in the 3.5.1 release (or possibly even the 3.6 release!), so if correct colour profiles are important to you, you&#8217;re either going to want to start using the hourly/nightly builds or downgrade back to an earlier version of Firefox which doesn&#8217;t have the bug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://01welp.co.uk/2009/06/mozilla-firefox-35-beta-4-and-colour-profiles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One camera, one year</title>
		<link>http://01welp.co.uk/2009/06/one-camera-one-year/</link>
		<comments>http://01welp.co.uk/2009/06/one-camera-one-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>welp</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bessa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One camera one year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rangefinder]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://01welp.co.uk/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I wrote in my last blog post, I&#8217;m currently looking into getting a film rangefinder such as the Bessa R3a. Obviously, such cameras don&#8217;t come cheap, and I&#8217;ve been looking into ways to make it worth my while (and money!). I uncovered (somehow, whilst browsing around) [this project].
Now, I know the article is rather [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I wrote in my last blog post, I&#8217;m currently looking into getting a film rangefinder such as the Bessa R3a. Obviously, such cameras don&#8217;t come cheap, and I&#8217;ve been looking into ways to make it worth my while (and money!). I uncovered (somehow, whilst browsing around) [this project].</p>
<p>Now, I know the article is rather explicit in saying that one should use a Leica, but I quite frankly don&#8217;t have the money to buy one, and believe that a camera such as the Bessa R3M (similar to the R3a, but with no auto-exposure) would be an ideal camera to complete the project with. As the writer quite rightly points out in his [next article], Leica cameras hold their value extremely well, and you could quite easily re-sell the camera for what a price very close to what you bought it for. As I mentioned earlier, there&#8217;s no way I&#8217;d be able to fork out for a £2500 camera unless I got like two full-time jobs or something silly along those lines, so I think a £300-400 Bessa will have to do.</p>
<p>It is advised in the original article that one should shoot as many rolls of film per week as possible. This is a pretty large expenditure, but I imagine that I would purchase a box of 10 rolls of whichever film I decide to use per month. This would probably amount to around £35 a month for the raw film, and approximately another £35 a month for processing costs. The article recommends getting 1-6 &#8220;work-prints&#8221; per film &#8211; I would not get prints of these photos, but instead upload them to Flickr, so I would effectively be uploading between 10 and 60 photos a month. Every month, I would pick out the two most interesting photos (as calculated by Flickr) from what I had uploaded that month, and get prints made of them.</p>
<p>The monthly cost would come to around £85 a month, with an initial outlay of around £800 for a camera and lens, and £200-250 for a film scanner.</p>
<p>(Oh, and in case you&#8217;re wondering, I would most likely get a 50mm lens. Or possibly a 40mm lens. Not 100% sure on that one.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://01welp.co.uk/2009/06/one-camera-one-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
